Background :Cochlear implantation(CI)is increasingly used in adults with single-sided deafness(SSD)and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) , but comparative single-center outcome data remain limited.We evaluated 1-year changes in patient-reported auditory benefit, tinnitus burden, device use, and objective speech perception after CI. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 124 adults(SSD n=88, AHL n=36)who underwent CI at Samsung Medical Center(2019-2024) .Outcomes included CI-aided thresholds, daily device usage, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI) , Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly(HHIE) , and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale(SSQ) .Group comparisons and prepost analyses were performed.A subgroup(SSD n=50, AHL n=15)underwent CI-ear-isolated speech testing via Bluetooth-assisted direct streaming.Results At baseline, SSD patients were younger(SSD 51. 7±13. 2 vs AHL 58. 3±13. 5 years ; p=0. 003)and had shorter deafness duration(SSD 4. 5±6. 3 vs AHL 15. 0±15. 3 years ; p<0. 001) .SSD patients had worse baseline auditory handicap with lower SSQ speech scores(47. 4±21. 7 vs 76. 7±26. 6 ; p<0. 001) , higher HHIE(66. 3±26. 8 vs 47. 3±23. 4 ; p< 0. 001) , and higher THI(44. 3±25. 0 vs 30. 0±30. 3 ; p=0. 042) .Baseline CNC scores were comparable.At 1 year, both groups improved in SSQ domains and HHIE, with no between-group differences in change(all p>0. 40) .THI improvement was greater in SSD than AHL(20. 7±23. 3 vs 2. 2±30. 7 ; p=0. 008) .Daily device use was similar(10. 6±3. 8 vs 10. 7± 4. 2 h/day ; p=0. 68) .CI-ear-isolated speech perception favored SSD for monosyllabic(52. 4±19. 1% vs 35. 4±23. 0% ; p=0. 014) , bisyllabic(83. 6±15. 1% vs 65. 7±28. 3% ; p=0. 011) , and sentence recognition(94. 5±14. 0% vs 81. 1±26. 8 % ; p=0. 005) .Conclusion CI provided comparable patient-perceived benefit and device acceptance in SSD and AHL despite differing baseline characteristics.CI-ear-isolated speech outcomes indicate distinct auditory performance profiles, supporting tailored counseling in asymmetric hearing loss.
Chaturvedi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: