Retrospective trial evaluates auditory benefits in adults with single-sided deafness versus asymmetric hearing loss, suggesting tailored counseling.
Background :Cochlear implantation(CI)is increasingly used in adults with single-sided deafness(SSD)and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) , but comparative single-center outcome data remain limited.We evaluated 1-year changes in patient-reported auditory benefit, tinnitus burden, device use, and objective speech perception after CI. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 124 adults(SSD n=88, AHL n=36)who underwent CI at Samsung Medical Center(2019-2024) .Outcomes included CI-aided thresholds, daily device usage, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI) , Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly(HHIE) , and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale(SSQ) .Group comparisons and prepost analyses were performed.A subgroup(SSD n=50, AHL n=15)underwent CI-ear-isolated speech testing via Bluetooth-assisted direct streaming.Results At baseline, SSD patients were younger(SSD 51. 7±13. 2 vs AHL 58. 3±13. 5 years ; p=0. 003)and had shorter deafness duration(SSD 4. 5±6. 3 vs AHL 15. 0±15. 3 years ; p<0. 001) .SSD patients had worse baseline auditory handicap with lower SSQ speech scores(47. 4±21. 7 vs 76. 7±26. 6 ; p<0. 001) , higher HHIE(66. 3±26. 8 vs 47. 3±23. 4 ; p< 0. 001) , and higher THI(44. 3±25. 0 vs 30. 0±30. 3 ; p=0. 042) .Baseline CNC scores were comparable.At 1 year, both groups improved in SSQ domains and HHIE, with no between-group differences in change(all p>0. 40) .THI improvement was greater in SSD than AHL(20. 7±23. 3 vs 2. 2±30. 7 ; p=0. 008) .Daily device use was similar(10. 6±3. 8 vs 10. 7± 4. 2 h/day ; p=0. 68) .CI-ear-isolated speech perception favored SSD for monosyllabic(52. 4±19. 1% vs 35. 4±23. 0% ; p=0. 014) , bisyllabic(83. 6±15. 1% vs 65. 7±28. 3% ; p=0. 011) , and sentence recognition(94. 5±14. 0% vs 81. 1±26. 8 % ; p=0. 005) .Conclusion CI provided comparable patient-perceived benefit and device acceptance in SSD and AHL despite differing baseline characteristics.CI-ear-isolated speech outcomes indicate distinct auditory performance profiles, supporting tailored counseling in asymmetric hearing loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaturvedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: