A physiological model showed that a blunted arterial baroreflex response produces heart rate turbulence patterns corresponding to pathological values of turbulence onset and slope.
Does a blunted arterial baroreflex cause pathological heart rate turbulence patterns (TO and TS) in a physiological model?
This physiological modeling study suggests that blunted arterial baroreflex function is the underlying mechanism for pathological heart rate turbulence (TO and TS), which are known risk stratifiers for sudden cardiac death.
Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in developed countries. Recently, two post-myocardial-infarction risk predictors were introduced that are superior to all other presently available indicators: turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS). These parameters characterize the behavior of instantaneous heart rate after a ventricular premature beat, i.e., they describe the reestablishing of heart rate control after an acute perturbation. We propose that the dysfunction of an important cardiovascular control mechanism, the arterial baroreflex, is the mechanism behind these new potent markers. The hypothesis is tested by means of a physiological model involving the excitation generation in the heart, the hemodynamic situation in the aorta, and baroreceptor feedback mechanisms. The data show that a blunted baroreceptor response of the heart resembles patterns of heart rate turbulence that correspond to pathological values of TO and TS. The results of the model suggest that the recently established risk parameters TO and TS characterize baroreflex function, a known risk stratifier in patients.
Mrowka et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Post-myocardial infarction. Blunted arterial baroreflex was evaluated on Heart rate turbulence (turbulence onset and turbulence slope). A physiological model showed that a blunted arterial baroreflex response produces heart rate turbulence patterns corresponding to pathological values of turbulence onset and slope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: