The cosmological constant Λ has functioned since 1917 as a stabilising and lateraccelerating term in cosmological models. It fits observational data but lacks a generativeexplanation. This paper proposes a reframing grounded in the Cohesion unified fieldtheory (Gilbert 2025–2026): rather than a static constant, Λ is better understood asthe observable signature of dynamic boundary pressure — the pressure imposed on theobservable universe by the next higher scale. In the Cohesion UFT framework this isPs, the substrate pressure that drives all internal dynamics. Λ is not a number theuniverse happens to have. It is the rhythm the universe is continuously generating inresponse to that boundary pressure.The canonical observational proxies — Type Ia supernovae, the cosmic microwavebackground (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and gravitational lensing— are reinterpreted as probes of specific Cohesion UFT operators: Surplus release,compression imprint, calibration cycles, and pressure gradient mapping respectively.The cosmological constant problem — the 10120 discrepancy between observed Λ andquantum vacuum predictions — dissolves under this reframing, because the CohesionUFT framework does not predict that quantum vacuum energy should equal Λ. Itpredicts that Λ measures the boundary pressure from the next scale, which is a separatequantity.This paper is an application of the Cohesion unified field theory and the Scaling GRframework (Gilbert 2026 1, 3). It does not add new physics but derives cosmologicalconsequences not yet stated explicitly in those papers.
Dexter Gilbert (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: