PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse

HIS Alternative II

His bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure

Presented by Michael Vinther

Subspecialty: Devices & Arrhythmias

Published in JACC Clinical Electrophysiology

Key Result

His/LBB pacing was noninferior to biventricular pacing for left ventricular reverse remodeling: LVESV decreased 35% with His/LBB pacing versus 34% with biventricular pacing.

What did this trial find?

The HIS Alternative II trial compared His bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure, presented by Michael Vinther.

Abstract

HIS Alternative II compared conduction-system pacing (His bundle or left bundle branch) with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and typical left bundle branch block. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end-systolic volume. LVESV fell 35% with His/LBB pacing versus 34% with biventricular pacing, and the trial met its noninferiority criterion. Presented in Hot Line 10 at ESC Congress 2026 with simultaneous publication in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology (10.1016/j.jacep.2026.08.008).

Part of ESC Congress 2026 — European Society of Cardiology Annual Congress, Munich

View this trial on Synapse: synapsesocial.com/esc/trials/his-alternative-ii

Full paper: synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8fbb6717152b56e6b6483e

ESC 2026Results in
49

HIS Alternative II

His bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure

Hot Line 10Devices & ArrhythmiasJACC Clinical ElectrophysiologySimultaneous Publication

Key Result

  • His/LBB pacing was noninferior to biventricular pacing for left ventricular reverse remodeling: LVESV decreased 35% with His/LBB pacing versus 34% with biventricular pacing.

Abstract

HIS Alternative II compared conduction-system pacing (His bundle or left bundle branch) with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and typical left bundle branch block. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end-systolic volume. LVESV fell 35% with His/LBB pacing versus 34% with biventricular pacing, and the trial met its noninferiority criterion. Presented in Hot Line 10 at ESC Congress 2026 with simultaneous publication in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology (10.1016/j.jacep.2026.08.008).

Read

Read Full Paper

Discussion (0)

Be the first to discuss HIS Alternative II. Share your insights or questions.