An invasive strategy reduced death, MI, or rehospitalization in men and high-risk women, while low-risk women benefited more from a conservative treatment approach.
Does an early invasive treatment strategy reduce the composite of death, MI, or rehospitalization with ACS compared to a conservative strategy in women and men with NSTE ACS?
An early invasive strategy is beneficial for men and high-risk women with NSTE ACS, while a conservative strategy is supported for low-risk women.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
In NSTE ACS, an invasive strategy has a comparable benefit in men and high-risk women for reducing the composite end point of death, MI, or rehospitalization with ACS. In contrast, our data provide evidence supporting the new guideline recommendation for a conservative strategy in low-risk women.
O’Donoghue et al. (Tue,) reported a other. An invasive strategy reduced death, MI, or rehospitalization in men and high-risk women, while low-risk women benefited more from a conservative treatment approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: