Configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice and Theological Framing in Predicting Inclusive Disability Perception: The Haryono 2³ Theological-Configurational Model
Key Points
The research aims to develop a model that predicts inclusive disability perception using integrative KAP and theological framing.
Developed a configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice model.
Utilized Haryono 2³ factorial design for analysis.
Applied binary logistic regression to examine predictors of inclusive perception.
Generated eight congregational profiles based on dichotomized predictors.
Knowledge acts as a catalytic moderating variable in predicting inclusive perception.
Practical engagement alone does not ensure inclusive theological transformation.
Identified probabilistic differences in perception among the eight profiles.
Abstract
This working paper develops and tests a configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice (KAP) model integrated with theological framing to predict inclusive disability perception within congregational contexts. Employing a Haryono 2³ factorial design and binary logistic regression, the study analyzes how three dichotomized predictors—Knowledge (K), Attitude (A), and Practice (P)—generate eight congregational profiles that correspond to probabilistic differences in inclusive perception. The findings suggest that practical engagement alone does not guarantee inclusive theological transformation; rather, knowledge operates as a catalytic moderating variable. The study contributes to empirical theology, disability studies, and congregational research by operationalizing theological constructs within a quantitative predictive framework.
Configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice and Theological Framing in Predicting Inclusive Disability Perception: The Haryono 2³ Theological-Configurational Model | Synapse
2Configurational Determinants of Metanoia: Integrating Johannine Soteriology into a Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) Framework via The Haryono 2³ Configurational Model2026