December 7, 2022

Evaluation of right ventricle systolic function after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A systematic review comparing cardiac magnetic resonance and global longitudinal strain

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Right ventricle GLS can be considered for routine follow-up of TOF repair patients, even though CMR remains the noninvasive gold standard method. Using a single parameter may not allow comparison of the accuracy of 3D RV EF by using CMR and GLS. Further studies with a larger number of patients undergoing TOF repair are required to evaluate the correlation between these examinations.

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Oliveira et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eede59a84321e0ae63c3b2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15486

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 20132013 · 753 citations
2Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009 · 64,232 citations
3Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers2013 · 446 citations
4The evaluation of right ventricular systolic function in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot by conventional echocardiographic methods and speckle tracking echocardiography: Compared with the gold standard cardiac mangenetic resonance2019 · 21 citations
5Impact of surgical pulmonary valve replacement on ventricular strain and synchrony in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking study2018 · 37 citations

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark