In patients with aortic stenosis, normalized flow displacement in the ascending aorta was significantly associated with LV mass index (P=0.0058) and relative wall mass (P=0.0283).
Observational (n=74)
Do 4D-flow MRI-derived abnormal blood flow patterns and wall shear stress associate with left ventricular remodeling in patients with aortic stenosis?
4D-flow MRI demonstrates that abnormal blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the ascending aorta are associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with aortic stenosis.
p-value: p=0.0058
Background— Aortic stenosis (AS) leads to variable stress for the left ventricle (LV) and consequently a broad range of LV remodeling. The aim of this study was to describe blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with AS and determine their association with remodeling. Methods and Results— Thirty-seven patients with AS (14 mild, 8 moderate, 15 severe; age, 63±13 years) and 37 healthy controls (age, 60±10 years) underwent 4-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging. Helical and vortical flow formations and flow eccentricity were assessed in the ascending aorta. Normalized flow displacement from the vessel center and peak systolic wall shear stress in the ascending aorta were quantified. LV remodeling was assessed based on LV mass index and the ratio of LV mass:end-diastolic volume (relative wall mass). Marked helical and vortical flow formation and eccentricity were more prevalent in patients with AS than in healthy subjects, and patients with AS exhibited an asymmetrical and elevated distribution of peak systolic wall shear stress. In AS, aortic orifice area was strongly negatively associated with vortical flow formation ( P =0.0274), eccentricity ( P =0.0070), and flow displacement ( P =0.0021). Bicuspid aortic valve was associated with more intense helical ( P =0.0098) and vortical flow formation ( P =0.0536), higher flow displacement ( P =0.11), and higher peak systolic wall shear stress ( P =0.0926). LV mass index and relative wall mass were significantly associated with aortic orifice area ( P =0.0611, P =0.0058) and flow displacement ( P =0.0058, P =0.0283). Conclusions— In this pilot study, AS leads to abnormal blood flow pattern and peak systolic wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. In addition to aortic orifice area, normalized flow displacement was significantly associated with LV remodeling.
Knobelsdorff‐Brenkenhoff et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Aortic stenosis (n=74). 4-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Association of normalized flow displacement with LV mass index and relative wall mass (p=0.0058). In patients with aortic stenosis, normalized flow displacement in the ascending aorta was significantly associated with LV mass index (P=0.0058) and relative wall mass (P=0.0283).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: