Does endurance training compared to resistance training improve left ventricular mass and end-diastolic volume in previously untrained twins?
Endurance training, but not resistance training, significantly increases left ventricular mass and end-diastolic volume in previously untrained individuals, with limited genetic impact on adaptation.
PURPOSE: Changes in left ventricular mass (LVM) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) in response to exercise training are important determinants of functional capacity in health and disease, but the impact of different exercise modalities remains unclear. METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design we studied the impact of resistance (RES) and endurance (END) training using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in previously untrained monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs (n = 72; 22 MZ pairs, 14 DZ same-sex pairs; 26.1 ± 5.4 yr). Twins, as pairs, undertook 3 months of RES and 3 months of END training (order randomized), separated by a 3-month washout. RESULTS: Group results revealed that END increased LVM (P 0.05). A higher proportion of individuals responded to END than RES for LVM (72% vs 38%, P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that cardiac adaptation in response to exercise is modality-specific and that low responders to one mode of exercise can be high responders to an alternative. Heritability estimates based on cross-sectional data, which suggested a genetic contribution to LVM, do not accord with estimates based on training effects, which indicated limited genetic impact on adaptation in this 3-month study of exercise training. This study has implications for understanding the physiological and health impacts of typically used exercise modalities on cardiac adaptation in previously untrained individuals.
Marsh et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: