Radiofrequency catheter ablation using closed loop temperature control resulted in a lower incidence of coagulum formation compared to power control mode (0.8% vs 2.2%, P<0.01).
Cohort (n=270)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=< .01
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate electrode temperatures obtained using a radiofrequency ablation system that incorporates closed loop feedback control to achieve preset target electrode temperatures and to determine if closed loop temperature control results in a lower incidence of developing a coagulum. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred seventy patients underwent catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, an accessory pathway, and/or the atrioventricular junction using an ablation system incorporating closed loop feedback control. Forty-five patients underwent catheter ablation in the power control mode in which power output was fixed, and 225 patients underwent catheter ablation in the temperature control mode. A coagulum occurred during 0.8% of radiofrequency applications in the temperature control mode versus 2.2% in the power control mode (P .05). CONCLUSIONS: Temperature monitoring with closed loop control of power output facilitates radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures by minimizing the probability of developing a coagulum while ensuring maximum lesion formation.
Calkins et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, accessory pathway, and/or atrioventricular junction (n=270). Radiofrequency catheter ablation in temperature control mode vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation in power control mode was evaluated on Incidence of developing a coagulum during radiofrequency applications (p=< .01). Radiofrequency catheter ablation using closed loop temperature control resulted in a lower incidence of coagulum formation compared to power control mode (0.8% vs 2.2%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: