Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper presents a review and comparative study of recent multi-view 2D and 3D approaches for human action recognition. The approaches are reviewed and categorized due to their nature. We report a comparison of the most promising methods using two publicly available datasets: the INRIA Xmas Motion Acquisition Sequences (IXMAS) and the i3DPost Multi-View Human Action and Interaction Dataset. Additionally, we discuss some of the shortcomings of multi-view camera setups and outline our thoughts on future directions of 3D human action recognition.
Holte et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: