A group-based psychosocial intervention program significantly reduced mortality compared to usual care in women with coronary heart disease (7% vs 20%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.74; P=0.007).
RCT (n=237)
Does a group-based psychosocial intervention program reduce mortality in women hospitalized for coronary heart disease?
A group-based psychosocial stress reduction program significantly reduced long-term mortality in women with coronary heart disease compared to usual care.
Odds Ratio: 0.33 (95% CI 0.15–0.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.007
BACKGROUND: Psychosocial stress may increase risk and worsen prognosis of coronary heart disease in women. Interventions that counteract women's psychosocial stress have not previously been presented. This study implemented a stress reduction program for women and investigated its ability to improve survival in women coronary patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven consecutive women patients, aged 75 years or younger, hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to a group-based psychosocial intervention program or usual care. Initiated 4 months after hospitalization, intervention groups of 4 to 8 women met for a total of 20 sessions that were spread over a year. We provided education about risk factors, relaxation training techniques, methods for self-monitoring and cognitive restructuring, with an emphasis on coping with stress exposure from family and work, and self-care and compliance with clinical advice. From randomization until end of follow-up (mean duration, 7.1 years), 25 women (20%) in the usual care and 8 women (7%) in the stress reduction died, yielding an almost 3-fold protective effect of the intervention (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.74; P=0.007). Introducing baseline measures of clinical prognostic factors, including use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, and statins into multivariate models confirmed the unadjusted results (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although mechanisms remain unclear, a group-based psychosocial intervention program for women with coronary heart disease may prolong lives independent of other prognostic factors.
Orth‐Gomér et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Coronary heart disease (n=237). Group-based psychosocial intervention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Death (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.74, p=0.007). A group-based psychosocial intervention program significantly reduced mortality compared to usual care in women with coronary heart disease (7% vs 20%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.74; P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: