Key result
A group-based psychosocial intervention program significantly reduced mortality compared to usual care in women with coronary heart disease (7% vs 20%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.74; P=0.007).
Why the study?
Does a group-based psychosocial intervention program reduce mortality in women hospitalized for coronary heart disease?
Population
n=237 consecutive women patients, aged 75 years or younger, hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction…
Comparison
Group-based psychosocial intervention program… vs Usual care.
Design
RCT, Randomized
Follow-up
mean 7.1 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports integrating group psychosocial intervention into care for women with CHD; extends randomized evidence for mortality reduction.
RCT (n=237)
Does a group-based psychosocial intervention program reduce mortality in women hospitalized for coronary heart disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.33 (95% CI 0.15–0.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.007
A group-based psychosocial stress reduction program significantly reduced long-term mortality in women with coronary heart disease compared to usual care.
Orth‐Gomér et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=237). Group-based psychosocial intervention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Death (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.74, p=0.007). A group-based psychosocial intervention program significantly reduced mortality compared to usual care in women with coronary heart disease (7% vs 20%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.74; P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: