ZP123 did not affect the inducibility of ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia compared to saline at any plasma concentration (e.g., 77% vs 75% at 0.8 nM).
RCT (n=26)
randomly assigned
Does ZP123 reduce the inducibility of ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia and triggered activity in dogs with coronary artery occlusion?
Pharmacological stimulation of gap junction intercellular communication with ZP123 does not prevent ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia or triggered activity in a canine model.
The role of gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) in ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia (VT) is unknown. We have developed a new, stable antiarrhythmic peptide analog named ZP123 that selectively increases GJIC and prevents reentrant VT. Our aim in this study was to use ZP123 as a tool to assess the role of GJIC on occurrence of ischemia-induced focal VT and triggered activity (TA) due to delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs). Focal VT was induced by programmed stimulation in alpha-chloralose-anesthetized, open-chest dogs 1-4 h after coronary artery occlusion. Three-dimensional activation mapping was done using 6 bipolar electrograms on each of 23 multipolar needles in the risk zone. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either saline or ZP123 cumulatively at three dose levels (an intravenous bolus followed by a 30-min infusion per dose). Attempts to induce VT were repeated in each dose. Mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma ZP123 concentrations. Standard microelectrode techniques were used for in vitro study of DADs and TA. Twenty-six dogs with focal VT were included. ZP123 did not affect the inducibility of focal VT at any plasma concentrations vs. saline (0.8 +/- 0.1 nM, 77 vs. 75%; 7.8 +/- 0.4 nM, 86 vs. 77%; and 78.8 +/- 5.0 nM, 77 vs. 91%). In vitro, ZP123 did not affect the induction of DADs (12/12) and TAs (10/10) in ischemic tissues or tissue removed from the origin of focal VT (DADs, 8/8; TAs, 4/4). Therefore, although indirect, the data with the doses and concentrations used suggest that GJIC may not play a major role in the genesis of focal activity in the ischemic models studied.
Xing et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia (n=26). ZP123 vs. Saline was evaluated on Inducibility of focal ventricular tachycardia. ZP123 did not affect the inducibility of ischemia-induced focal ventricular tachycardia compared to saline at any plasma concentration (e.g., 77% vs 75% at 0.8 nM).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: