Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Training & Skills Assessment (MP73)1 May 2024MP73-13 NEW HUGO RAS SYSTEM ROBOTIC MEDTRONIC SIMULATION PLATFORM: IS IT EFFECTIVE TO TRAIN RESIDENTS? Francesco Esperto, Loris Cacciatore, Francesco Prata, Antonio Testa, Gianlugi Raso, Marco Ricci, Giuseppe D'Addurno, Alberto Ragusa, Antonio Minore, Andrea Iannuzzi, Matteo Pira, Matteo Pino, Pasquale Calle', Francesco Tedesco, Roberto Mario Scarpa, and Rocco Papalia Francesco EspertoFrancesco Esperto , Loris CacciatoreLoris Cacciatore , Francesco PrataFrancesco Prata , Antonio TestaAntonio Testa , Gianlugi RasoGianlugi Raso , Marco RicciMarco Ricci , Giuseppe D'AddurnoGiuseppe D'Addurno , Alberto RagusaAlberto Ragusa , Antonio MinoreAntonio Minore , Andrea IannuzziAndrea Iannuzzi , Matteo PiraMatteo Pira , Matteo PinoMatteo Pino , Pasquale Calle'Pasquale Calle' , Francesco TedescoFrancesco Tedesco , Roberto Mario ScarpaRoberto Mario Scarpa , and Rocco PapaliaRocco Papalia View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001009564.26544.1c.13AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The use of robotic surgery in Urology has grown exponentially in the last decade, but robotic surgery training as lagged behind. The launch of new robotic platforms has paved the way for new robotic training systems. The aim of our study is to test the new training system from Hugo™ RAS System – Medtronic. METHODS: From Dec 2022 to Feb 2023 residents (res) attended an advanced integrated robotic simulation training course with Hugo™ RAS System – Medtronic at our institution. Baseline data were collected. Residents were asked to perform three robotic exercises under the mentorship of a robotic tutor. Their performance was evaluated according to an objective Hugo system form (5 parameters were evaluated: timing, range of motion, panoramic view, conflict of instruments and exercise completed) and to a Likert score motivation evaluation. The rate of improvement was assessed from first to last exercise. After training, res received a preformed Likert 10 scale satisfaction questionnaire. Descriptive and variance analysis was performed through SPSS v27. RESULTS: A total of 44 res, 16 female (36.4%) and 28 male (63.6 %), were enrolled. Among these, 12 (27.3%) were general surgery res, 8 were gynaecology res (18.2%), and 24 (54.5%) were urology res. 16 first year (36.4%), 16 second year (36.4%), 2 third year, (4.5%), 4 fourth year (9.1%) and 6 at the last year of residency (13.6%). 18 (40.9%) didn't spend any time, 26 (59.1%) spent less than 3 hours/day and no one spent more than 3 hours playing video games. 68.2% of residents had laparoscopic experience. 90,9% declared to have interest in robotic. Table 1 shows the rate of improvement for all residents, with a statistically significant results (p<0,05). Mean overall satisfaction score±SD was 9.4±1.2. CONCLUSIONS: The highly simulated and adaptable Hugo™ RAS System may be an effective way to improve residents' surgical skills. This protocol training may be standardized in order to have basic certified robotic surgical skills before operating on a real patient. Source of Funding: No funding © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e1187 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Francesco Esperto More articles by this author Loris Cacciatore More articles by this author Francesco Prata More articles by this author Antonio Testa More articles by this author Gianlugi Raso More articles by this author Marco Ricci More articles by this author Giuseppe D'Addurno More articles by this author Alberto Ragusa More articles by this author Antonio Minore More articles by this author Andrea Iannuzzi More articles by this author Matteo Pira More articles by this author Matteo Pino More articles by this author Pasquale Calle' More articles by this author Francesco Tedesco More articles by this author Roberto Mario Scarpa More articles by this author Rocco Papalia More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Esperto et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: