PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2016Heart91 citationsOpen Access

Validation of presentation and 3 h high-sensitivity troponin to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction

JPJohn W. PickeringJGJaimi GreensladeLCLouise Cullen

Key Result

The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm to rule-in AMI showed a positive predictive value of 83.5% (95% CI 74.9-90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1-80.5%) for hs-cTnT, but rule-out sensitivity was too low.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,061)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity troponin algorithm accurately rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?

P
Population
1061 adult patients attending an emergency department with possible acute myocardial infarction (chest pain), pooled from five distinct prospectively recruited cohorts across three countries.
I
Intervention
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care rule-in algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) or T (hs-cTnT) measured at presentation (0 h) and 3 h post-presentation.
C
Comparator
Independently adjudicated diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy (positive predictive value for rule-in and sensitivity for rule-out) of the ESC 0/3h algorithm for acute myocardial infarction.

The ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity troponin algorithm provides good positive predictive value for ruling in AMI, but its sensitivity is insufficient to safely rule out AMI in clinical practice.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines to rule-in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) recommend an algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) sampling on presentation and 3 h following presentation. We tested the diagnostic accuracy of this algorithm by pooling data from five distinct cohorts from three countries of prospectively recruited patients with independently adjudicated outcomes. METHOD: We measured high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) on presentation (0 h) and 3 h post-presentation samples in adult patients attending an ED with possible AMI to validate the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care rule-in algorithm (ESC-rule-in). Specifically, (i) in patients with a 0 h hs-cTn concentration ≤99th percentile and a 3 h hs-cTn >99th percentile, positive patients are those with an absolute change in troponin ≥50% of the 99th percentile, and (ii) in patients with a 0 and 3 h hs-cTn >99th percentile, positive patients are those with a relative change in troponin of ≥20%. We concurrently assessed the efficacy of the 0 and 3 h hs-cTn <99th percentile to rule-out AMI. RESULTS: 1061 patients with hs-cTnI and 985 with hs-cTnT were included. The ESC-rule-in positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.5% (95% CI 74.9% to 90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1% to 80.5%) for hs-cTnT. Forty-six AMIs (34.9%) were not ruled in using hs-cTnI and 62 (46.2%) using hs-cTnT. The sensitivity of the 99th percentile to rule-out AMI was 93.2% (95% CI 87.5% to 96.8%) for hs-cTnI and 94.8% (95% CI 89.5% to 97.9%) for hs-cTnT. CONCLUSIONS: The ESC-rule-in algorithm has good PPV with hs-cTnI and reasonable with hs-cTnT and can rule-in over 50% of AMIs. However, the sensitivity of the 99th percentile to rule-out AMI is too low for clinical use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pickering et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,061). ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin rule-in algorithm was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction. The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm to rule-in AMI showed a positive predictive value of 83.5% (95% CI 74.9-90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1-80.5%) for hs-cTnT, but rule-out sensitivity was too low.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13926a7fc80bf722c65eb7https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin I2017 · 38 citations
  2. 2Performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin: Systematic review and meta-analysis2020 · 25 citations
  3. 3P4696One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay2017 · 1 citations
  4. 4Normal presenting levels of high-sensitivity troponin and myocardial infarction2013 · 52 citations
  5. 5Evaluating Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay at Presentation2018 · 56 citations