Key result
The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm to rule-in AMI showed a positive predictive value of 83.5% (95% CI 74.9-90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1-80.5%) for hs-cTnT, but rule-out sensitivity was too low.
Why the study?
Does the ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity troponin algorithm accurately rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
Cohort (n=1,061)
Yes
Does the ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity troponin algorithm accurately rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
The ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity troponin algorithm provides good positive predictive value for ruling in AMI, but its sensitivity is insufficient to safely rule out AMI in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution using ESC 0/3h algorithm for AMI rule-out; leaves open prospective validation of rule-in performance.
OBJECTIVE: International guidelines to rule-in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) recommend an algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) sampling on presentation and 3 h following presentation. We tested the diagnostic accuracy of this algorithm by pooling data from five distinct cohorts from three countries of prospectively recruited patients with independently adjudicated outcomes. METHOD: We measured high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) on presentation (0 h) and 3 h post-presentation samples in adult patients attending an ED with possible AMI to validate the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care rule-in algorithm (ESC-rule-in). Specifically, (i) in patients with a 0 h hs-cTn concentration ≤99th percentile and a 3 h hs-cTn >99th percentile, positive patients are those with an absolute change in troponin ≥50% of the 99th percentile, and (ii) in patients with a 0 and 3 h hs-cTn >99th percentile, positive patients are those with a relative change in troponin of ≥20%. We concurrently assessed the efficacy of the 0 and 3 h hs-cTn <99th percentile to rule-out AMI. RESULTS: 1061 patients with hs-cTnI and 985 with hs-cTnT were included. The ESC-rule-in positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.5% (95% CI 74.9% to 90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1% to 80.5%) for hs-cTnT. Forty-six AMIs (34.9%) were not ruled in using hs-cTnI and 62 (46.2%) using hs-cTnT. The sensitivity of the 99th percentile to rule-out AMI was 93.2% (95% CI 87.5% to 96.8%) for hs-cTnI and 94.8% (95% CI 89.5% to 97.9%) for hs-cTnT. CONCLUSIONS: The ESC-rule-in algorithm has good PPV with hs-cTnI and reasonable with hs-cTnT and can rule-in over 50% of AMIs. However, the sensitivity of the 99th percentile to rule-out AMI is too low for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pickering et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,061). ESC 0/3h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin rule-in algorithm was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction. The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm to rule-in AMI showed a positive predictive value of 83.5% (95% CI 74.9-90.1%) for hs-cTnI and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1-80.5%) for hs-cTnT, but rule-out sensitivity was too low.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: