Molecular studies reveal metal-metal bond order differences in d3-d3 and d5-d5 complexes, indicating unique bonding characteristics in compounds containing Mo and Ru.
Hexakis(neopentyl)diruthenium(III,III) [Ru2(CH2CMe3)6 or Ru2Np6], first synthesized in 1984, is a d5-d5 analogue of the classic d3-d3 M2X6 Chisholm-type, unsupported metal-metal triply-bonded Group 6 complexes. We report an alternative synthetic route to Ru2Np6 and an updated low-temperature crystal structure. The Ru-Ru bond length (2.3141(3) Å) is only 0.15 Å longer than the Mo-Mo bond in Mo2Np6, less than might be expected upon adding four electrons. The Ru-Ru bond was originally proposed to be a triple bond, which seemed inconsistent with the usual M-M bonding model. We use DFT and TD-DFT calculations on Mo2R6 and Ru2R6 (R = Me, Np) to investigate the differences in metal-metal and metal-ligand bonding between the d3-d3 and d5-d5 systems. In the Ru2R6 systems, the two RuR3 fragments adopt a pyramidalized geometry to maximize ligand-to-metal donation and to shift electron density from the strongly antibonding Ru-Ru π* orbital to the weakly bonding Ru-Ru δ orbital, thus preserving some of the Ru-Ru π bonding. In contrast, the MoR3 fragments in Mo2R6 adopt a more trigonal planar geometry to preserve the Mo-Mo π bonding. The calculated and experimental UV-vis spectra are near band-for-band matches, and the energies and orbital characters of the excitations are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaw et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: