Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article gives an overview of the types of feedback that Estonian high school students receive for their written assignments. The data for the article comes from surveys which were conducted among high school students and their teachers. The results show that the main form of feedback for finished assignmets is a grade or a general commentary for the whole class. For unfinished assignments, feedback is most commonly given for specific parts of the assignment (e.g. as comments in the text). Both for finished and unfinished assignments, feedback mostly comes from the teacher, which greatly increases their workload, while peer review is used less often. It can also be seen that students ask for extra feedback voluntarily, e.g. from their family, which implies that they would like to have more feedback for their written assignments than is currently typically available. Because the teachersâ resources for giving feedback are limited, peer review should be implemented more, as this helps not only to learn more thoroughly about the subject of the assignment but also develops writing and other language skills. To make more use of peer review, teachers should put more emphasis on the communicative situations created through written assignments and set the criteria for the assignment evaluation accordingly. Artiklis antakse ülevaade gümnaasiumiõpilaste ja -õpetajate küsitluste tulemustest: kas ja kuidas koolis kirjutamisülesandeid tagasisidestatakse. Ãpilaste küsitluses osales 501 ning õpetajate omas 280 vastajat. Tulemustest selgub, et peamine tagasiside valmistekstidele on hinne või üldine tagasiside tervele klassile, valmimisjärgus oleva teksti puhul antakse kõige enam tagasisidet konkreetsetele tekstikohtadele (nt kommentaaridena teksti kõrval). Kõige rohkem annab tagasisidet õpetaja. Tulemused näitavad veel, et tagasiside ei ole korraldatud süsteemselt ega õppimist toetaval moel ja ligi pooled õpilased küsivad nt oma pereliikmetelt tekstidele tagasisidet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kati Käpp (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: