Integration of genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveals lncRNA variants affecting mitochondrial function in male infertility, suggesting new therapeutic avenues.
Background/Objectives: Male infertility is a major health concern with a complex etiopathology, yet a substantial proportion of cases remain idiopathic. Mitochondrial dysfunction and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) deregulation have both been implicated in impaired spermatogenesis, but their interplay remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify infertility-specific variants in ncRNAs that affect mitochondrial dynamics and homeostasis and to explore their roles. Methods: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on genomic DNA samples from teratozoospermic, asthenozoospermic, oligozoospermic, and normozoospermic men. Variants uniquely present in infertile individuals and mapped to ncRNAs that affect mitochondrial dynamics were selected and prioritized using bioinformatics tools. An independent transcriptomic validation was conducted using RNA-sequencing data from testicular biopsies of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) to determine whether the ncRNAs harboring WGS-derived variants were transcriptionally altered. Results: We identified several infertility-specific variants located in lncRNAs known to interact with mitochondrial regulators, including GAS5, HOTAIR, PVT1, MEG3, and CDKN2B-AS1. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed significant deregulation of these lncRNAs in azoospermic testicular samples. Bioinformatic analysis also implicated the disruption of lncRNA–miRNA–mitochondria networks, potentially contributing to mitochondrial membrane potential loss, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, impaired mitophagy, and germ cell apoptosis. Conclusions: Our integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis highlights lncRNA–mitochondrial gene interactions as a novel regulatory layer in male infertility, while the identified lncRNAs hold promise as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, future functional studies are warranted to elucidate their mechanistic roles and potential for clinical translation in reproductive medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stamatellos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: