Mixed-methods research validates a medication safety self-assessment tool in primary healthcare, suggesting improvements in managing adverse drug events.
Background Medication safety remains a global public health challenge, particularly in resource-constrained primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a specific, proactive, medication safety self-assessment tool tailored for primary healthcare settings in China. Methods A mixed-methods approach combining literature review, field investigations, a Delphi expert consultation (3 rounds), and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was implemented. Forty-three voluntarily participating settings completed the self-assessment, with effectiveness validated through correlation analysis between assessment scores and adverse drug events (ADEs) indicators (medication errors, dispensing/prescribing errors). Results We constructed a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary care settings comprising 5 domains, 18 core characteristics, and 84 self-assessment items. The mean percent score for 43 participating primary care settings was 81.5% ± 11.7%, and Spearman’s rank correlations were used to examine the relationship between the overall assessment scores to the incidence of ADEs (Correlation Coefficient is −0.448, p = 0.003). Conclusion As the first medication safety assessment tool for Chinese primary healthcare settings, based on current medication practices and validated through ADE, implementation demonstrates potential to enhance medication safety practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yong-guang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: