Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research compares kernel and matrix inversion methods in transitioning from dual basis to vector space, highlighting efficiency implications.
In this work, we study and compare two methods for passing from a dual basis to the basis of a finite-dimensional vector space by recalling the passage from a basis to its dual. For the inverse transition, we clarify the kernel method for linear forms and the matrix inversion method, the former exploiting the properties of linear forms and orthogonality, while the latter relies on the explicit inversion of transition matrices, with remarks for each approach depending on the context of application. The study shows that, although matrix inversion is a more direct method, the kernel method can offer a more elegant and efficient alternative in certain cases, especially when the vector space has particular structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makiese et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: