Analysis shows how wage setting structures influence efficiency of taxes versus subsidies in emissions reduction.
In the context of a unionized labor market and green consumerism, this paper analyzes, within a vertically differentiated duopoly, which environmental policy – taxes or subsidies – is more efficient in reducing polluting emissions and enhancing social welfare. The structure of wage setting proves to be crucial in determining final outcomes. Specifically, under firm-specific unions with decentralized wage setting, a subsidy policy is more efficient than a tax policy. Conversely, when an industry-wide union sets wages centrally, the tax policy outperforms the subsidy policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vergari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: