Screening highlights optimal reference genes for qPCR in quinoa under cold, heat, and drought stress, indicating effective normalization methods.
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), a stress-tolerant pseudocereal ideal for studying abiotic stress responses, was used to systematically identify optimal reference genes for qPCR normalization under gradient stresses: low temperatures (LT group: −2 °C to −10 °C), heat (HT group: 39° C to 45 °C), and drought (DR group: 7 to 13 days). Through multi-algorithm evaluation (GeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, the ΔCt method, and RefFinder) of eleven candidates, condition-specific optimal genes were established as ACT16 (Actin), SAL92 (IT4 phosphatase-associated protein), SSU32 (Ssu72-like family protein), and TSB05 (Tryptophan synthase beta-subunit 2) for the LT group; ACT16 and NRP13 (Asparagine-rich protein) for the HT group; and ACT16, SKP27 (S-phase kinase), and NRP13 for the DR group, with ACT16, NRP13, WLIM96 (LIM domain-containing protein), SSU32, SKP27, SAL92, and UBC22 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2) demonstrating cross-stress stability (global group). DHDPS96 (dihydrodipicolinate synthase) and EF03 (translation elongation factor) showed minimal stability. Validation using stress-responsive markers—COR72 (LT), HSP44 (HT), COR413-PM (LT), and DREB12 (DR)—confirmed reliability; COR72 and COR413-PM exhibited oscillatory cold response patterns, HSP44 peaked at 43 °C before declining, and DREB12 showed progressive drought-induced upregulation. Crucially, normalization with unstable genes (DHDPS96 and EF03) distorted expression profiles. This work provides validated reference standards for quinoa transcriptomics under abiotic stresses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: