Preliminary study shows reduced decisional conflict and increased knowledge in Japanese women with BRCA1/2 variants, suggesting effective support for cancer management decisions.
Aim This study aimed to evaluate a decision aid for Japanese women (J‐DA) with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants for supporting breast and ovarian cancer management decisions. Methods This study used a pre‐ and post‐intervention design. The participants included Japanese women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who needed to make a decision regarding breast and ovarian cancer management options. Results All 25 participants completed the pre‐ and posttests. There was a significant reduction in the decisional conflict scale and a significant increase in the knowledge score. Significant improvements were identified in the decisional conflict scale score ( g = 0.60, p = .002) and knowledge score ( g = −1.44, p < .001). Four weeks post‐intervention, 96% of the participants had made a decision regarding the management options for breast or ovarian care. Conclusions The findings suggest that the decision aid (J‐DA) positively supported the decision‐making of the Japanese women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. As this study apparently represents the first evaluation of a decision aid for this population, subsequent studies are anticipated to further confirm its clinical applicability and utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: