Machine learning improves detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with volatile organic compounds, indicating the potential for enhanced diagnostic strategies.
Aims Approximately 25%–30% of the global population is affected by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to explore whether NAFLD could be effectively detected using 341 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) via 10 machine learning (Mach-L) algorithms in a cohort of 1,501 individuals. Methods Participants were selected from the Taiwan MJ cohort, which includes comprehensive demographic, biochemical, lifestyle, and VOCs data. NAFLD was diagnosed by experienced gastroenterologists. Exhaled breath samples were collected using a 1.0-L aluminum bag (late expiratory fraction) and analyzed with selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Ten Mach-L techniques were employed to evaluate two predictive models: Model 1 (demographic, lifestyle, and biochemical data), and Model 2 (Model 1 + VOCs), assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Subjects with NAFLD had significantly higher values for age, BMI, blood pressure, and other biomedical markers, except for eGFR and HDL-C. Key predictors of NAFLD included BMI, triglycerides (TG), uric acid (UA), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), γ-GT, gender, LDL-C, and sleep duration. The addition of VOCs to Model 1 improved the AUC from 0.722 ± 0.149 to 0.770 ± 0.264 (p < 0.001). Ten VOCs were identified as the most influential, in order of importance: 2-propanol, acetone, butyl 2-methylbutanoate, diethylethanolamine, urethane, β-caryophyllene, furfural, tridecane, 4-methyloctanoic acid, and (S)-2-methyl-1-butanol. Conclusion Incorporating VOCs into traditional demographic, biochemical, and lifestyle data significantly enhanced the model’s predictive performance. This suggests that VOCs may be associated with the underlying pathophysiology of NAFLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: