This research demonstrates machine learning effectively predicts free energy in metal-organic frameworks, suggesting improved synthetic accessibility.
A major bottleneck in translating computational screening of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to laboratory synthesis is the uncertain synthetic accessibility of computer-generated MOF designs. While MOF free energy calculations are emerging as a way to anticipate synthetic accessibility, the computational cost of traditional molecular simulation methods remains incompatible with the immense MOF design space, which spans trillions of structures. Here we propose and demonstrate the efficient prediction of this important quantity using machine learning. Our approach is based on three ingredients: (1) a newly curated dataset of nearly 1 million MOFs and their properties, including measured free energies for a subset of these structures; (2) a novel sequence representation of MOFs, called MOFSeq, that incorporates both local and global MOF features; and (3) a large language model (LLM-Prop) pre-trained on strain energy prediction and then fine-tuned on free energy prediction using MOFSeq. Our trained model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.789 kJ/mol on free energy prediction. Remarkably, this same model, without retraining, demonstrated exceptional versatility by predicting MOF synthesizability with a 97% F1 score. Furthermore, it correctly selected the right MOF polymorph with an average accuracy of 78.1%, with this accuracy increasing to 100% for free energy differences greater than 4.05 kJ/mol and remaining above 60% even when the free energy difference was as low as 0.16 kJ/mol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubungo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: