Experimental analysis reveals modality-dependent effects on movement preparation and subsequent control in target reaching tasks.
Online movement variability in non-visual (auditory and proprioceptive) target reaching is modality-dependent. This study investigated whether such modality-specific effects emerge during movement preparation and whether this phase influences subsequent online control. Participants performed reaching movements toward auditory, proprioceptive, or audio-proprioceptive targets. Electromyography and movement kinematics were recorded to examine the effects of sensory modality on sensory encoding and motor coordination during movement preparation, as well as online control at 5%, 50%, and 100% of movement time. Results revealed a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase, whereas a modality-independent motor coordination phase. Movement variability was greater for auditory targets than for proprioceptive and audio-proprioceptive targets at 50% and 100% of movement. Only motor coordination influenced early online control (5%), but this effect was modality-independent. These findings demonstrate that the influence of sensory modality extends beyond execution to the preparatory phase of movement. The results support a four-stage model of action control: a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase of preparation and late online control, alongside a modality-independent motor coordination phase and early online control. These findings offer new insight into the temporal dynamics of sensorimotor control without vision, indicating that non-visual sensory information is differentially used during distinct phases of movement preparation and execution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Camponogara (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: