Case study demonstrates economic evaluation methods to incorporate social value in HTA processes, suggesting improved prioritization for healthcare technologies.
South Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods. We mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods. The results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints. South Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murphy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: