This review highlights distinct oxidative stress responses in SoxR from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, suggesting tailored adaptations to superoxide.
The [2Fe-2S] transcription activator SoxR, a member of the MerR family, functions as a bacterial stress-response sensor. The response governed by SoxR is mediated either directly or indirectly by superoxide (O2-). In this review, we describe functional differences between Escherichia coli SoxR (EcSoxR) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR (PaSoxR). Pulse radiolysis demonstrated that the reduced form of EcSoxR reacts directly with O2- with a second-order rate constant of 5.0 × 108 M-1s-1. PaSoxR was found to undergo a similar reaction, although with 10-fold smaller rate constant (4.0 × 107 M-1s-1). This difference in rate constants reflects distinct regulatory features of EcSoxR and PaSoxR. Specifically, mutagenesis studies, have shown that Lysine residues, located close to [2Fe-2S] clusters, in EcSoxR―which are not conserved in PaSoxR―are essential for EcSoxR activation. Supporting the model of indirect activation by O2-, both EcSoxR and PaSoxR were found to react with various redox-active compounds (RACs), including viologens, phenazines, and quinones, with no apparent differences in the kinetic behavior or specificity of the two proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazuo Kobayashi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: