Synthesized via a sol-gel method, electric resistivity increased with doping in cobalt ferrite, indicating potential for high-frequency applications.
Abstract The Ti⁴⁺-Mn²⁺ co-doped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles, CoFe2-2xTixMnxO₄ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20), were synthesized via the sol-gel auto-combustion method to investigate their structural, magnetic, electrical, and dielectric properties. X-ray diffraction confirmed a single-phase cubic spinel structure for all compositions, with lattice constants increasing with doping concentration (x), attributed to ionic radius disparities between substituted (Ti⁴⁺, Mn²⁺) and host (Co²⁺, Fe³⁺) ions. Scherrer’s analysis revealed crystallite sizes (nanoscale: ~17–24 nm), consistent with nanocrystalline morphology. SEM images displayed spherical grains with an average size of 50–80 nm with moderate agglomeration. FTIR spectra exhibited characteristic absorption bands near 600 cm⁻¹ and 400 cm⁻¹, affirming the spinel framework. Magnetic properties, including saturation magnetization (45–60 emu/g) and magneton number, exhibited non-monotonic trends with doping, likely due to cation redistribution and spin canting. DC resistivity increased with x, linked to reduced electron hopping between Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ ions as Ti⁴⁺ and Mn²⁺ occupied octahedral sites. Dielectric parameters (permittivity, loss tangent) decreased with rising frequency 1 kHz-1 MHz, typical of Maxwell-Wagner interfacial polarization. The Ti⁴⁺-Mn²⁺ co-doping induced tunable structural distortions and cation redistribution, enhancing electrical resistivity while retaining magnetic functionality. These modifications, coupled with low dielectric losses at high frequencies, suggest the optimized compositions x = 0.15–0.20 are promising for high-frequency applications, such as miniaturized inductors, antennas, and electromagnetic interference shielding materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ubale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: