Randomized controlled trial improved subjective well-being and social functioning in schizophrenia patients, suggesting narrative nursing has therapeutic value.
Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effects of narrative nursing interventions grounded in the Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) holistic health model on subjective well-being, social functioning, and depressive symptoms among inpatients with schizophrenia. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 119 hospitalized patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, who were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 60) or a control group (n = 59). While the control group received routine care, the intervention group received an additional four-week BMS-based narrative nursing program, comprising weekly group sessions (2–3 hours each). Outcome measures included the General Well-Being Schedule, the Social Functioning of Inpatients with Schizophrenia Scale, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results Following the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in subjective well-being and social functioning scores, alongside a significant reduction in depressive symptoms (P < 0.001). Analysis of covariance further indicated that the reduction in HAMD scores was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to controls (F = 42.482, P < 0.001). Effect size analysis using Cohen’s d revealed large effects in favor of the intervention across all outcome domains. Conclusion The BMS-based narrative nursing intervention significantly alleviated depressive symptoms and enhanced both subjective well-being and social functioning in inpatients with schizophrenia. These findings suggest that narrative nursing guided by a holistic in the Body-Mind-Spirit framework holds promising clinical value and warrants broader application in psychiatric rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: