Analysis reveals age impacts relapse risk in multiple sclerosis patients using high-efficacy DMT, suggesting tailored treatment strategies.
Background: Treatment strategy for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is increasingly shifting towards first-line use of high-efficacy DMT (H-DMT). However, DMT efficacy declines with increasing age and the benefit of first line H-DMT at higher age remains unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate whether the superiority of H-DMT over moderate-efficacy DMT (M-DMT) depends on age. Methods: Using the Austrian MS database, we included previously DMT-naive RMS patients aged >18 years, who i) initiated a DMT continuing it for >12 months, ii) had MRI at baseline, and iii) had clinical follow-up for >24 months. Cox regression analyses including age and DMT strategy (H-DMT vs. M-DMT) plus an interaction effect were employed to predict time to re-lapse. Results: A total of 215 RMS patients (median age of 41 years [25th-75th percentiles: 32-53], 66% females) were observed over a median of 42 (28-58) months. During this period, eighty-one (38%) patients had a relapse. While increasing age was associated with decreased risk of re-lapse (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-0.98, p<0.001), the use of H-DMT lowered the risk of relapse compared to M-DMT (HR 0.06, 95%-CI: 0.01-0.45, p=0.007). In patients with H-DMT, the benefit of treatment was reduced by increasing age (HR: 1.06, 95%-CI: 1.01-1.11, per year, p=0.031). Superiority of H-DMT over M-DMT was esti-mated to be lost at the age of approximately 50 years. Conclusion: The benefit of H-DMT over M-DMT as first-line treatment decreases with in-creasing age and seems to vanish in patients above approximately 50 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hegen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: