Scoping review evaluates measurement methodologies and their influence on reproductive health decisions in refugee women.
Reproductive health literacy (RHL) is essential to women’s ability to make informed reproductive health (RH) decisions and is a key determinant of RH outcomes. Resettled refugee women often experience poorer RH outcomes, yet there is limited research on their RHL and its influence on RH decision-making. This scoping review aims to (1) to evaluate existing methods for measuring RHL among resettled refugee women and (2) to characterize the relationship between RHL, RH decision-making, behavior, and outcomes among refugee women residing in high-income countries. A search of peer-reviewed literature published in English found limited direct measurement of RHL. Measurement methods were primarily qualitative or based on unvalidated survey instruments, limiting comparability and generalizability. The current methodologies do not adequately capture RH knowledge or RHL proficiency. A range of additional factors were found to influence RH decision-making and behavior, supporting the need for a means to accurately measure RHL. Further quantitative research is needed to clarify the extent to which RHL and knowledge influence RH behavior and outcomes. The development of a culturally relevant, validated RHL instrument that integrates knowledge and contextual influences would support healthcare providers and public health agents in serving and designing effective interventions for refugee women post-resettlement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tseng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: