Assessment of Patients’ Quality of Care in Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review

Introduction: Assessing the quality of patient care within healthcare systems remains a multifaceted challenge due to varying definitions of “quality” and the complexity of care delivery structures worldwide. Patient-centeredness, institutional responsiveness, and contextual adaptability are increasingly recognized as core pillars in quality assessment. Objective: This narrative literature review aims to explore conceptual models and practical frameworks for evaluating healthcare quality, emphasizing tools that integrate technical, functional, and emotional dimensions and proposing a comprehensive model adaptable to diverse health system contexts. Methodology: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the years 2000 to 2024. Studies were selected based on relevance to quality assessment models, patient satisfaction, accreditation, and strategic improvement methodologies. The review followed a thematic synthesis approach, integrating structural, process-based, and outcome-driven perspectives. Results: Core frameworks such as Donabedian’s model and balancing measures were reviewed alongside evaluation tools like the Dutch Consumer Quality Index, SERVQUAL, and Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA). These models revealed significant gaps between patient expectations and actual service delivery, especially in functional and emotional quality dimensions. This review also identified limitations related to contextual generalizability and bias. A novel integrative model is proposed, emphasizing the dynamic interaction between institutional structure, clinical processes, and patient experience. Conclusions: High-quality healthcare demands a multidimensional approach. Integrating conceptual frameworks with context-sensitive strategies enables healthcare systems to align technical performance with patient-centered outcomes. The proposed model offers a foundation for future empirical validation, particularly in resource-limited or hybrid settings.