This review identifies gaps in demand-response aggregator frameworks and suggests game-theoretic approaches to enhance privacy and scalability.
The decarbonization of electricity generation by 2030 and the realization of a net-zero economy by 2050 are central to the United States’ climate strategy. However, large-scale renewable integration introduces operational challenges, including extreme ramping, unsafe dispatch, and price volatility. This review investigates how demand–response (DR) aggregators and distributed loads can support these climate goals while addressing critical operational challenges. We hypothesize that current DR aggregator frameworks fall short in the areas of distributed load operational flexibility, scalability with the number of distributed loads (prosumers), prosumer privacy preservation, DR aggregator and prosumer competition, and uncertainty management, limiting their potential to enable large-scale prosumer participation. Using a systematic review methodology, we evaluate existing DR aggregator and prosumer frameworks through the proposed FCUPS criteria—flexibility, competition, uncertainty quantification, privacy, and scalability. The main results highlight significant gaps in current frameworks: limited support for decentralized operations; inadequate privacy protections for prosumers; and insufficient capabilities for managing competition, uncertainty, and flexibility at scale. We conclude by identifying open research directions, including the need for game-theoretic and machine learning approaches that ensure privacy, scalability, and robust market participation. Addressing these gaps is essential to shape future research agendas and to enable DR aggregators to contribute meaningfully to US climate targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kampezidou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: