This systematic review reveals that maternal zika virus infection significantly increases the risk of microcephaly and other congenital anomalies, suggesting critical prevention strategies.
Background: Maternal Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is associated with severe congenital outcomes, most notably microcephaly, and newer studies published after early reviews have broadened the recognized spectrum of defects and clarified the role of infection timing. Objective: To update the systematic review and meta-analysis through March 2025, estimating the risk of microcephaly and other congenital outcomes after maternal ZIKV infection, with subgroup analyses by gestational trimester. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS for observational studies reporting laboratory-confirmed maternal ZIKV infection and congenital outcomes. Eligible designs were cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies with an unexposed or test-negative control group. Two reviewers independently extracted sample sizes, outcomes, and timing of infection and assessed study quality. Random-effects meta-analyses produced pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals; prespecified subgroup and publication-bias analyses were performed. Results: Eighteen studies (4,523 exposed pregnancies; 9,710 controls) met inclusion criteria. The pooled risk of microcephaly was elevated (OR 12.5; 95% CI 7.8-20.1; I2=62%). Other congenital anomalies (e.g., intracranial calcifications, ventriculomegaly) were also increased (OR 8.4; 95% CI 4.5-15.7). First-trimester infection showed the highest risk (OR 18.3; 95% CI 9.7-34.6). Conclusions: Maternal ZIKV infection substantially increases the risk of microcephaly and other congenital anomalies, particularly when infection occurs early in gestation. Continued surveillance and targeted prevention remain essential in endemic regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: