Cohort study reveals higher dry eye disease prevalence in heavy visual display terminal users, suggesting reduced use may lower risk.
Abstract Objective: To investigate the association between visual display terminal (VDT) usage frequency and the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED), ocular surface signs, and their trends over a 1-year follow-up among adults in Beijing. Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited 1040 adults(393 males, 647 females; mean age 54.72 ± 17.993 years. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their VDT usage frequency: high-frequency(T1), medium-frequency(T2)and low-frequency(T3). Data on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and clinical signs of DED were collected at baseline and after the 1-year follow-up. Examinations included measurements of tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), meibomian gland (MG) assessment. Results: The prevalence of DED decreased from 34.1% to 32.2% after follow-up. T1 and T2 group had a significantly higher prevalence of DED than T3 groups at both time points (P<0.001). A decreasing trend in DED prevalence was observed with reduced VDT usage. The incidence of new DED cases was 9.27%. A significant transition between DED and non-DED status occurred during the follow-up (P<0.001). NIBUT and CFS showed slight increases, MG assessment slightly decreased (P<0.05). OSDI and TMH Changes were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: VDT usage is associated with a higher prevalence of DED. Reducing VDT usage may help lower the risk of DED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jie et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: