Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review investigates recent developments in cardiac mechano-electrical-fluid interaction (MEFI) modeling, with a focus on multiphysics simulation platforms and digital twin frameworks developed between 2015 and 2025. The purpose of the study is to assess how computational modeling methods—particularly finite element and immersed boundary techniques, monolithic and partitioned coupling schemes, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced surrogate modeling—capture the integrated dynamics of cardiac electrophysiology, tissue mechanics, and hemodynamics. The goal is to evaluate the translational potential of MEFI models in clinical applications such as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), arrhythmia classification, atrial fibrillation ablation, and surgical planning. Quantitative results from the literature demonstrate <5% error in pressure–volume loop predictions, >0.90 F1 scores in machine-learning-based arrhythmia detection, and <10% deviation in myocardial strain relative to MRI-based ground truth. These findings highlight both the promise and limitations of current MEFI approaches. While recent advances improve physiological fidelity and predictive accuracy, key challenges remain in achieving multiscale integration, model validation across diverse populations, and real-time clinical applicability. The review concludes by identifying future milestones for clinical translation, including regulatory model certification, standardization of validation protocols, and integration of patient-specific digital twins into electronic health record (EHR) systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: