Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic literature review indicates comparable vaccine effectiveness in children, suggesting updates to guidelines may be necessary.
Circulating influenza strains, vaccine effectiveness (VE), and vaccine recommendations vary over time. A systematic literature review (SLR), random effects meta-analysis (REMA), and network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated absolute VE (aVE) and relative VE (rVE) of LAIV and IIV in children/adolescents from initial LAIV approval in 2003. Northern Hemisphere studies (2003-2023) with children ≤19 yrs were included. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed risk-of-bias. REMA estimated aVE and three-node NMA (LAIV-IIV-unvaccinated) estimated rVE over three periods: 2003-04 to 2008-09 (pre-2009 A(H1N1) pandemic); 2010-11 to 2016-17 (post-2009 pandemic); 2017-18 to 2022-23 (post-LAIV strain-selection optimization). 109 studies included. aVE of LAIV and IIV against any influenza was similar (~50%) in each period. Effectiveness of LAIV vs. IIV against influenza types/subtypes was comparable except: (1) greater effectiveness with IIV for A(H1N1) in 2010-11 to 2016-17 (rVE -46% [95% CI: -57, -33]); (2) greater effectiveness with LAIV for influenza B in 2017-18 to 2022-23 (rVE 196% [95% CI: 73, 406]). In 2017-18 to 2022-23, effectiveness of LAIV and IIV against A(H1N1) was similar (rVE 10% [95% CI: -35, 87]). LAIV and IIV have demonstrated comparable effectiveness against any influenza in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuurman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: