Retrospective analysis shows a 96.6% surgical success rate in 29 patients, indicating enhanced health-related quality of life and reduced psychological distress.
Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive ureteral reconstruction for benign strictures and analyze its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological status.Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients undergoing robotic/laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction at our institution. Surgical outcomes were assessed through imaging, laboratory parameters, and patient-reported outcomes using SF-36 and HADS.Results With a median follow-up of 12 months, the surgical success rate was 96.6%, accompanied by a significant reduction in postoperative serum creatinine levels (p < 0.05). The perioperative complication rate was 6.90% (2 cases of transient high fever), with no severe adverse events observed. Preoperative SF-36 scores in PF and BP domains were significantly lower than those of the general population (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, except for VT and MH domains which surpassed population norms, scores in other dimensions showed no significant differences compared to the general population (p > 0.05). Notably, all SF-36 domains (except RE) demonstrated significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.05). Additionally, both anxiety and depression scores assessed by HADS decreased markedly after surgery (p < 0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive ureteral repair and reconstruction effectively relieves obstruction, improves renal function, and significantly enhances health-related quality of life and psychological well-being, representing a safe therapeutic option for benign ureteral strictures. Early surgical intervention reduces the need for long-term stent or nephrostomy placement, thereby alleviating physical and psychological burdens. Further studies with expanded cohorts and extended follow-up durations are warranted to validate long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: