Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility study shows virtual reality reduces pain in chronic low back pain patients, suggesting novel treatment potential.
BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) is an effective non-pharmacological method to reduce acute and chronic pain. For the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP), it offers benefits over traditional treatment options, such as the possibility of gamified movement exercises with real-time performance feedback and virtual embodiment. OBJECTIVE In the current feasibility study, we implemented a novel immersive VR intervention that combined all these elements. METHODS Patients with CLBP took (N = 20) part in the prospective and pre-registered trial over nine weeks. The VR therapy phase lasted three weeks with two VR sessions per week. Before the start of the therapy phase, there was a two-week baseline phase and the post-therapy phase lasted four weeks. During the sessions, patients wore a head-mounted display. In VR, they embodied a virtual avatar and performed gamified movement exercises (graded exposure). Meanwhile, they received real-time feedback on performance. Primary outcome measures were pain intensity ratings, adherence and side effects. Secondary outcomes included back- and task-specific functioning and questionnaires to assess fear avoidance beliefs. RESULTS Adherence was high (n =18, respective 90 % completed the study), and participants indicated lower pain in the post-therapy phase compared with baseline levels (P = .004, d = 0.82). There were only few and minor side effects. Task- and back-specific functioning was improved, i.e. performing daily-life activities (BPS: P = .018, ????2g = .04; RDQ: P = .018, ????2g = .08), and movement restrictions decreased (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the feasibility and analgesic effects of a novel intervention combining gamified movement exercises with real-time feedback in VR and body illusions. A randomized controlled trial is needed to test the specificity of the effects. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trials Register (ID DRKS00031535)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neumann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: