Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 28, 2025

Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen in Sub-Acute Adult Stroke Survivors

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KCKate CowenFTFaye TaboneSWSam Sappho Webb

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cross-sectional study evaluates reliability and validity of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen in stroke survivors, indicating its potential effectiveness for assessing visual perception difficulties.

Key Points

  • The Oxford Visual Perception Screen evaluates visual perception difficulties in stroke survivors.
  • Inter-rater reliability showed strong agreement with equivalent ratings (N=107, p < .001).
  • Convergent validity demonstrated a high correlation of .78 with the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery.
  • Evidence suggests that OxVPS is better at measuring visual perception than cognition or sensory vision.

Cite This Study

Cowen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a093fe6551bb0af8ce9f0https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ym7wj_v2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Oxford visual perception screen detects visual perception difficulties in sub-acute adult stroke survivors: an early cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study2026
  2. 2The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties2024
  3. 3Clinicians’ perspectives on the impact of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen in stroke care: a mixed methods study.2025
  4. 4Comparison of the Tele-Oxford Cognitive Screen to a neuropsychological battery in chronic stroke survivors2025
  5. 5Comparison of the Tele‐Oxford Cognitive Screen to a neuropsychological battery in chronic stroke survivors2025