Background: Assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resectability after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains a diagnostic challenge. Traditional computed tomography (CT) criteria often fail to distinguish viable tumor from fibrosis, necessitating a reassessment of imaging-based standards. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on prospective and retrospective studies over the past 25 years that evaluated the role of CT and complementary imaging modalities (MRI, PET-CT) in predicting resectability post-NAT in non-metastatic PDAC. Studies with small sample sizes or case reports were excluded. Results: Across studies, conventional CT parameters—particularly >180° vascular encasement—showed a limited correlation with histologic invasion or surgical outcomes after NAT. Persistent vessel contact on CT often reflected fibrosis, rather than active tumor. Dynamic changes, such as regression in the tumor–vessel interface and vessel lumen restoration, correlated more accurately with R0 resection. Adjunct markers like CA 19-9 response and patient performance status further improved resectability prediction. Conclusions: CT-based resectability assessment after NAT should transition from static morphologic criteria to response-based interpretation. Multidisciplinary evaluation integrating radiologic, biochemical, and clinical findings is essential to guide surgical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.
Christofilis et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: