Comparison of PID and adaptive control algorithms improves crankshaft speed stability in diesel engines, highlighting performance metrics implications.
This study compares PID and adaptive control algorithms for stabilizing the crankshaft speed of a diesel engine. Key performance metrics — response time, overshot and steady-state error — were analysed to evaluate control effectiveness. Experiments were conducted on a dynamometer test bench with variable mechanical loads introduced via alternator load adjustments. All tests were performed at a constant crankshaft speed using National Instruments measurement equipment and custom LabVIEW-based software for real-time monitoring. The analysis included four algorithms, among them a novel adaptive control strategy developed by authors. Statistical methods were used to assess performance differences. Results show that the proposed adaptive algorithm significantly improved control performance: approximately 20% in response time, 15% in overshoot, and 10% in error relative to the PID and covariance-based benchmarks. These findings highlight the potential of adaptive control in applications such as air-fuel ratio regulation, turbocharger pressure control, knock detection, and fuel optimisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magryta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: