This review highlights nanotechnology's role in improving drug delivery and immune modulation in autoimmune diseases.
Background: Autoimmune diseases are chronic, debilitating conditions caused by the immune system mistakenly attacking healthy tissues. Conventional treatments mainly involve broad immunosuppression, which is associated with significant side effects, lim-ited specificity, and suboptimal long-term outcomes. Objective: This review aims to ex-plore recent advances in nanotechnology-based therapies for autoimmune diseases, fo-cusing on their mechanisms, therapeutic applications, and clinical translation potential. Methods: A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted to examine various nanotechnology platforms, including drug-loaded nanoparticles, antigen-specific nanomedicines, RNA interference (siRNA), CRISPR-enabled systems, and stimu-li-responsive nanocarriers. Key preclinical and clinical studies were highlighted to evalu-ate efficacy and safety. Results: Nanomedicine offers multiple advantages over traditional therapies, such as targeted drug delivery, improved bioavailability, reduced systemic tox-icity, and potential induction of immune tolerance. Notable innovations include biode-gradable polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, micelles, exosome-mimetic nanoparticles, and magnetic nanomaterials. Emerging technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi deliv-ered via nanoparticles are advancing immune modulation in autoimmune models. De-spite promising outcomes, several barriers remain, including toxicity concerns, scale-up manufacturing issues, and regulatory challenges. Conclusion: Nanotechnology is rede-fining autoimmune disease therapy by shifting from non-specific immunosuppression to precision-targeted approaches. Future progress lies in integrating nanomedicine with personalized medicine to tailor treatments based on individual immune profiles. Contin-ued interdisciplinary collaboration and regulatory alignment are essential to translating these innovations into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barakat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: