Comparative analysis reveals random forest achieves 98.7% accuracy in lower limb movement classification among athletes.
In this article, the classification of signals arising from the movements of the lower limb of the leg (LLL) based on electromyography (EMG) (walking, sitting, up and down the stairs) was carried out. In the data collection process, 25 athletes aged 15-22 were involved, and two types of data sets (DS-dataset) were formed using FreeEMG and Biosignalsplux devices. Six important time and frequency domain features were extracted from the EMG signals — RMS (Root Mean Square), MAV (Mean Absolute Value), WL (Waveform Length), ZC (Zero Crossing), MDF (Median Frequency) and SSC (Slope Sign Changes). Several classification algorithms were used to detect and classify movements, including RF (Random Forest), NN (Neural Network), SVM (Support Vector Machine), k-NN (k-Nearest Neighbors) and LR (Logistic Regression) models. Analysis of the experimental results showed that the RF algorithm achieved the highest accuracy of 98.7% when classified with DS collected via the Biosignalsplux device, demonstrating an advantage in terms of performance in motion recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zohirov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: