Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 31, 2025

Research on the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Examination Based on 284 Prefecture-level Cities in China

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HLHao LiYLYuxiao LeiNWNuo Wang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Empirical examination reveals carbon reduction from emissions trading scheme in 284 cities, suggesting policy improvements.

Key Points

  • The emissions trading scheme effectively reduces total carbon emissions and carbon intensity in pilot regions.
  • Market mechanisms and administrative interventions work together, with administrative actions being more impactful.
  • Non-resource-based cities achieve greater carbon reduction than resource-based cities under ETS.
  • Regions with hybrid allowance allocation methods yield better carbon reduction outcomes than other allocation methods.

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a094be6551bb0af8cf2cfhttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7205446/v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Research on the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Examination Based on 284 Prefecture-level Cities in China2026
  2. 2An empirical analysis on emissions reduction effect and main reduction drivers of China's carbon emissions trading pilot2024
  3. 3Price Mechanism, Government Constraints and Carbon Trading Pilot Policy for Emission Reduction2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4The Incremental Impact of China’s Carbon Trading Pilots on Carbon Abatement2025
  5. 5Does China’s ETS change the quality and allocation of green innovation when treatment timing and spatial exposure are properly modeled?2026