Meta-analysis reveals functional response predicts invasiveness but not trophic impact in fish species, suggesting ecological implications.
Biological invasions are recognized as one of the primary drivers of biodiversity erosion mainly because invasive species wield greater trophic impact than their non-invasive counterparts. The experimental paradigm for assessing the trophic impact of invasive species is the functional response test. This test is frequently conducted on invasive species sampled within their native ranges, implicitly assuming that such measures can be extrapolated to the invasive range. Using a meta-analysis of 269 functional responses in 45 fish species, we confirm that invasive species exhibited higher functional responses than non-invasive species. However, this pattern holds true only when considering invasive species sampled in their native range. Invasive species studied in their invasive range displayed functional responses comparable to non-invasive species. These results raise questions on the use of functional responses to predict invasiveness and trophic impact and on the mechanisms leading to trait convergence between invasive and non-invasive species in introduced ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtois et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: